Showing posts with label gravity as dimension. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gravity as dimension. Show all posts

Monday, August 6, 2012

Magnetic time-space shift battery

More than a century ago Michael Faraday speculated that the electromotive force acting on the charge of an electron moving through a device or circuit is proportional to the time derivative of the magnetic field. The electromotive force and huge magneto resistance in magnetic tunnel junctions was brought into life thru a device by University of Miami Physicist Stewart E. Barnes, of the College of Arts and Sciences and with his collaborators at the Universities of Tokyo and Tohoku, Japan, which have created a device that can store energy in magnets rather than through chemical reactions.

This is a step in the direction which my theory about energy transitions between different dimensional time-space also applies, but above mentioned scientists think of it through conventional quantum theory, also based on Faraday's laws.

The above device stored thousand times more energy and was able to provide it for thousand times longest time period as predicted, which is way over anybody's expectations. Through experiment was done in nano-meter dimensions, it might be applied on larger devices.

My biggest replica to this test is the base of thinking itself. Scientists are trying to explain what happened and how the huge energy was stored using known laws, while my opinion is quite different.

What happens there indeed?

According to my speculative theory, the field energy distribution inside magnets are very similar to those inside black hole. As known, inside black hole time-space is compressed, so we can say time (or space) acts differently inside black hole than outside of it. So one second for observer inside black hole could feel like thousands or millions of seconds, depending on gravitation filed density inside black hole.
This also applies to mass and energy, so the sum of energy inside black hole is thousands or million times larger per same volume unit as per volume unit outside of it, of course, measuring with volume units of "outside" observer. So in theory we could store almost indefinite amount of energy (or mass?) inside a small black hole and carry it by in a briefcase, right?

The similar applies to dense magnetic field inside permanent magnets.The core of my speculative theory claims, that within very dense magnetic fields time-space is compressed or slowed down very similarly, as inside very strong gravitational fields.

But on the other side we know, magnetism is more like electricity and less like gravity. Electricity (applies to light, too) and magnetism both have and need known carrier particles, while gravity does not...ok, maybe the Strings theory or discovery of Bozon could give us more knowledge, but as of now, gravity does not need a particle to exist.
Also, both, electricity and magnetism are relative and related to velocity, which does not need to be at speed of light. Instead any speed will do.

So, what's the point? How can magnetism be related to electricity, while having a property of gravity?

If we start with known photon as a carrier for electromagnetic force or light, we know it exhibits both, wave and particle properties, and further, photon mass does not obey base mathematics by summing up the mass of photons, where single photons in observed space do not have any mass, but sum of observed space does.
This and many more anomalies in any known theories point into single direction of imprecision. Or even erroneous. Whish leads to conclusion: either we did not define particle or energy properly, or there is something left beyond, undefined, unknown.

And even more - quantum physics does not bother explaining, or if you like, does not reach so deep to explain where eV charge and energy for electrons orbiting around nucleus atomic core comes from, so quantum mechanics defined it simply as a property of electron. But by my opinion, there is more than just a simple property.
I believe that just there, at the imaginary paths of electrons and our imaginary picture of electron, which is not a particle, but has also some properties of a particle - well, here are some transitions of energy layers hidden. Quantum mechanics attaches magnetism property to electrons orientation, and my theory speculates, that this magnetic force is THE compressing mechanism on micro-level, which extracts energy to keep atom "alive" from upper dimensional space. To easier understand what I mean, we can imagine electrons rotation as a magnetic "pump", which alternates magnetic and electrical property of electron with very high frequency. Within each pump cycle, electron orbit enters one layer deeper into upper dimension, again said very simple, for example, jumps back and forth in time scale, so the orbit has a property of a slice of energy from the past and from the future. This results in potential difference and produces internal charge of electrons.

Now, one of the spikes in my theory is the speculation, that by dynamic influence with external magnetic field we can produce electric current on electron spin level. Each electron spin may have magnetic orientation changed, acting like a small electric generator. Electrons even do not need to be structured like in permanent magnets, but can or, in fact, MUST change positions for the electric current to occur.      

My theory tries to unveil the property of energy (and mass?), which can be layered, like into slices, where each slice is a bit shifted in time-space, or better, it extends into upper dimension, and this extent could be of any possible megnitude. There could be only one single layer of energy, which we can detect, produce, store and manipulate with, but there could also be many more layers, extending into upper dimension, which we cannot detect.

So how can we reach those other layers of energy or mass from upper dimension?

Now, with all those writing I am speculating a lot, but now my speculations will go even further. Don't blame me, I am just thinking :) Ok, my idea on how to reach the upper dimensional energy is a kind of time-space compressor, with the principle of already mentioned black hole.
This compressing mechanismus would squeeze our time-space continuum, like squeezing a tube, but only inside a special container, which could be a magnetic field container (different time-space properties inside dense magnetic field, against normal properties outside of it). I almost said also electric field, but no, electric or electromagnetic field can not be used to compress it's own time-space, because...well, I don't know, I just have such feeling. Maybe because electricity is a RESULT of forces, consequence of particle movements, while magnetism and gravity are BASE energies, with static properties, which do not need relative velocity for existence. Therefore gravity and magnetism may get caught into closed loop and produce almost infinite force, while electricity wores itself out in a closed loop.


This picture shows our normal time-space continuum, represented by straight tube, and how it might look like when influenced by strong magnetic (or gravitational) field.
Of course, this is just a visual aid, representation to easier understand what's going on, while in reality who knows, how it really looks like.

What's missing in this picture is our normal time-space in left picture, which you can imagine as putting "normal" tube over squeezed one - this normal tube would represent our normal time-space, which remains un-squeezed for outside observer.
So, when time-space inside strong magnetic field gets squeezed, the un-seen outer time-space (which is not in the picture) gets access to all the layered energy (or mass?) inbetween "normal" and "squeezed" continuum. Magnetism inside squeezed tube would need to break apart into base particles, atoms, maybe quarks, to return into normal time-space...but in such a situation our tube would inflate instead of squeeze.

What this means for energy storage?


Well, I think this means we can store thousands or millions of times more of energy inside permanent magnets, than with any other chemical method, which we are using now. The principle of magnetising is quick and seemingly permanent (because stored energy is so large, that it seems it never wores out), and is so quicker than battery recharging, that any comparison fails out unfair. Beside, stored energy is much, much larger on volume unit, compared to chemical batteries, which finally renders today's energy storage useless.

My prediction and oppinion is that in near future we will be able to store energy in small permanent magnet-type batteries, and one tiny battery will be able to run a vehicle for a month or even a year.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Behind the spacetime theory in 5th dimension

I may consider myself as a practical or observal physicist. Don't have high degrees (except when ill), but have very flexible, sometimes chaotic mind, having the ability to make sense of not yet related components. So, let's exploit Einstein's General Relativity Theory beyond known.

General Relativity theory parts used

We'll limit to few anchor points from General Relativity theory, which is essential to get theoretical starting point for my ideas of STARMAG engine.
  1. First claim is: Newtonian perception of time and space was that time is separated from space and it only helps us distinguish between different states of space. Albert Einstein grouped those two into spacetime, both being unconditionally related, where space or time could not exist without each other. As the space we imagine can be curved, so can be spacetime curved, which is beyond our perception, and also on the very edge of what we'll need here in my dissertation.
  2. The next important Einstein's theory result is that time runs slower as gravity increases. It's easy to understand if we take into account previous claim - imagine what happens when some mass is influenced by strong gravity - it begins compressing, becoming smaller and tighter as gravity increases. the same is valid for spacetime, as it is one component, so so both mass and time are compressed under higher gravity.
  3. Next, Einstein's bright idea was also that gravity and acceleration have the same effects on by-gravity-influenced or accelerated object. Meaning, if you are in a rocket which accelerates 9,8 m/s2 (1G), you are under the same condition as another man, standing on the Earth surface, being also influenced with 1G of gravity.
  4. My addition to the theory, which is VERY important, is a logical distinction between components of spacetime and gravity. within conditions of extreme gravity, like in black hole, we know that mass is actually collapsed into non detected, same with time as a related component, while black hole's gravity extends beyond the physical borders of spacetime dimensions. As spacetime cannot escape gravity, gravity itself cannot be influenced or related to gravity, meaning gravity is NOT part of spacetime, but rather another extension, possibly called spacetime-gravity, which could be 5th dimension by all means

Let's imagine 3D world in 4D

As we are 3D ready-made, our mind cannot think beyond 3D, because it is 3D-based and that's its final range. So to imagine higher dimensions, we can help by degrading dimensional fields down to our perception for easy understanding.
My favorite story, mentioned earlier, is by imaging 2D nation, which only knows about 2 dimensions. 3rd dimension, as up-down is unknown to them, but for us it is perfectly normal, that we can step-into their 2D world from above, also it is perfectly normal to step onto one place in 2D, then lift our foot, make a step forward and land our foot again into 2D world in some different position, which presents plain miracle for 2D nation - our footprint appearing from nothing here, then vanishes and appears in another place again. Further, for us it is also normal to just touch 2D surface, or to step hardly onto it, and even to put thousands of tons of metal there - but for 2D nation it is all the same for them - always just a 2D footprint, without enormous differences in 3rd dimension.

It is quite the same with our perception of TIME component in spacetime continuum. We can easily imagine objects being smaller, bigger, squeezing or extending them, but we cannot percept how to do the same with time dimension - how can time be expanded, compressed, how can we move in time backwards, forward, left, right and up and down. None of these can be understood by our mind naturally.
But in theory and actually in FACT it is all possible, it definitely is happening all the time, all the space and all the dimensions. We just don't get it.

The acceleration component

The most part of General Relativity assumes gravity can be neglected, meaning not considering its role in equations, which simplifies whole lot's of stuff. But let's take an example of above mentioned constant acceleration of 9,8 m/s2 against static gravity, present on Earth surface - both objects are under exact same influences, while for the first one we need to consume enormous energy to keep it accelerating, and for the second one it only needs to be placed statically on Earth surface.

With other words - simulating gravity force would end with consuming all existing energy resources, until all would vanish beyond speed of light in different equations.
But hey - what about temporary accelerations, everyday ones? Like driving a car or launching a rocket into space? These do not consume infinite quantities of energy, but rather only those available, being able to carry along and being said in simple words - I think this is the principle, which The Overall BALANCE of All That Exists protects itself from vanishing. Gravity as some Caretaker takes care that all we take from Earth to burn and consume, returns back to Earth for regeneration. So, in principle, it does not matter how fast we go, or how much we consume on the larger scale, because all that is will stay here.

Now, this is the energy transform law, where energy cannot vanish, nor appear from nothing. And here we came to dimensional transitions.

Trans-dimensional energy transitions

As in above example of 2D nation, these 2D people cannot and will never understand, how may one "thing" appear from 3rd dimension and vanish into it, because they are not built to sense movements beyond 2D. With same analogy we in 3D are not build and will probably never be able to construct a device, which would measure transitions in time-dimension. Even more - not only time-dimension, but also in 5th dimension!

Now magnets come into play

Magnetism is by my theory more gravity-alike, than any other energy. It is not spacetime limited, but by my understanding rather a side-effect of gravity....or maybe vice versa - gravity being side effect of magnetism.
If we take our Earth and strip it down layer by layer, we'll get a ball in size of an orange, with NO gravity! Same is valid for magnets - if we break them down, size them, we'll be left with a single particle, having no magnetic field at all.
So the partial conclusion is that like gravity, magnetism too is a component of spacetime existence, having the same astonishing effect on it - higher the magnetic field, slower the time!

Now, put the gravity and magnetism together

As gravity compresses spacetime, so does magnetism. But precaution here - extreme gravity influences time only INSIDE itself, not outside, meaning that time within center of increased gravity runs slower.
But let's warn about another fact - in lab testing, producing a higher gravity would require us to  - let's picture - twist (rotate and squeeze) time object, so it would become thiner and compressed, spirally twisted into new shape. Space on surface of previously thick object would experience time acceleration at the beginning of experiment, then during its phase new, slower timing would  influence the spacetime of twisted object itself, and when lab testing is over, we would need to release the twist, so the surface would now experience the reversed time shift, returning to previous, normal timeline.
So in basics, we would NEVER be able to measure or experience the shifted time, because when we would be back, no time would lapse.

This is important for the understanding of how magnets are pressured with energy.
By magnetizing the metal we actually "twist" the spacetime component, allowing twisted space to absorb enormous quantities of Earth magnetic energy, being it time-compressed. With other words, permanent magnets from inside are actually high-gravity/magnetism influenced, being thus able to contain a lot more energy, than it has been pressed into them to magnetize them.
This compressed and time-twisted energy can then be slowly released during our (normal) time and it will last longer than any other stored energy.

Let's twist words again:
Magnets are, by my theory, very much alike black-holes, except of that they are not 5-dimensional spacetime-gravity objects, but spacetime-magnetic objects.